|
| |
| |
| Two sections, A discussion of Genesis 39 and Genesis 39 |
| Genesis 39 Joseph was a successful man, in whatever he attempted, he came out ahead. Except for sexual sin, perhaps Joseph was perceptive enough that through his own family history, he knew the problems that went along with sexual deviancy. At any rate, he was unjustly imprisoned for a crime that he did not commit, and He was called out to minister to the people in whatever situation he found himself in. Joseph found favor in the Lord's sight, and God blessed the fruits of his labors. He was known as a great manager, and God made sure that he developed that talent by ministering to the people on the ground. |
| Genesis 39 Oh if only Adam had the wisdom to respond to Eve as Joseph did to Potiphers wife in verses 8-10. My 2 coins Shelley |
| Genesis 39: While there is are many ups and downs that that takes place in this chapter, we see that through it all, the whether things were seemingly going well, or if things were horrible, the comforting fact for Joseph was that "because the LORD was with him, and that which he did, the LORD made it to prosper." This is specifically noted in verses 2, 3, 5, 21 and 23. This is important because sometimes when things don’t seem to be working out the way we hope, we tend to feel that God has forsaken us, when the truth is that in good times and in bad, God is ever with us. One of the things I greatly appreciate about the Old Testament is that while it may not be as doctrinal in the texts we read and study, the OT goes a long way to vividly demonstrate how we can make the doctrinal truths taught in the NT real and powerful in our lives. Long before the Holy Spirit moved Paul to write, we see in Gen. 39 Joseph actually living the truth of Hebrews 13:5: "for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." (Heb 13:5) Reggie |
| Hey Shelly, Speaking of Adam and Eve… I find it amusing (most of the time) to hear people complain about how Eve messed things up for everybody. I prefer the view that Adam was there when Eve sinned… It is interesting to note, however, that sin is traced back to Adam as the representative for the race. Lee Jones |
| I agree, Adam loved her so much, I don't think he would allow any seperation,
remember, it was a perfect match. Joe. |
|
Genesis 39 August 29, 2004 Reading through the Bible in one Year: 1 Chronicles 15-19, Psalms 102-104 Weekly Memory Verse: John 1:12 Good Evening Brothers and Sisters, I realized after I mailed yesterday's study that I had forgotten to change the Bible reading for the day. I included both readings in the header of today's study. Genesis 39:1-23 (NASB95) In chapter 37 we discussed how that Joseph had the qualities of a prophet since he had held to a righteous standard with his brothers. Joseph is consistent with that quality and holds to moral purity as he works for the Egyptian as a slave in his house. Joseph was more concerned with what God thought in his life than being consumed with the short lived pleasure of sin. If you read the narrative carefully you will see that Joseph was very careful to avoid her approaches, and to avoid being around her. He was so serious about his convictions that he ran from the house on her last attempt. This should stand as an example of to all of us regarding sexual sin. Joseph avoided it at all costs, making sure to stay away from it. Where is the mark of purity and integrity in our lives today? Joseph demonstrated what it took to remain pure, even to the point of being thrown into prison for it. Potiphar seems to have warned Joseph about his wife, and that she was off limits. I wonder if he knew her nature. When she brought an accusation against Joseph, Potiphar did not hesitate to react to her story. It could have been that Potiphar did not trust Joseph completely due to Joseph's looks. As far as I know this is the only time in the Bible that someone was mentioned for their good looks, other than Rachel, Joseph’s mother, perhaps he favored his mother. Another point on this is the way that the wife is accusing Potiphar of bringing the Hebrew into the house to mock them. She sounds like that she has been guilty of unfaithfulness before, and since Joseph isn't going along with the plan, she is going to use him in a different way. By tearing him down she is hoping to build up herself in the sight of her husband. This time instead of being unfaithful, she is trying to appear that she has been faithful. I read in one commentary that the tunic was like a long t-shirt that went from the shoulder to the knees; in order to pull it off would have meant that extreme effort was put forth. He didn’t just run, he had to fight to get away. If Joseph defended himself, as a slave, he was expendable; capital punishment was swift in those days. Joseph went from being the object of her lust to the object of her hatred. Then he was put in prison just like a lamb going to slaughter, he wasn't able to defend himself at all. One note in Joseph's defense though, Potiphar must not have believed her entirely. According to ancient writings, adultery was punishable by 1000 blows, rape was even more severe. If you consider that Potiphar’s wife was married to a military leader that was in a high place in the government. This would have increased the severity of the punishment. Therefore being cast into prison was a very mild punishment for the crime. This demonstrates that Potiphar did not believe his wife. Please consider this note: Deuteronomy 22:23-27 (NASB95) “16–20 When her husband returns, she tells him the story, but once again it is adjusted to make the maximum impact on him. “The arousal of ethnic prejudice (‘the Hebrew’) again goes with social incitement, but in the reverse direction. With Potiphar now … addressee, Joseph is no longer termed ‘man’ but ‘slave’ just as ‘us’ shifts in reference (and solidarity) from the household to the master and mistress. To sting her husband into action, she again throws on him part of the blame, though by another clever adjustment of psychological tactics, in a manner less shrill and more cautious” (Sternberg, Poetics, 425). Whereas she had provoked the slaves by saying “He [i.e., Potiphar] brought a man into us to fool with us,” she addresses Potiphar more circumspectly, so as not to insult him. “The Hebrew slave came into me” puts the blame fully on Joseph and at the same time reminds Potiphar that he is a mere slave and a foreign one at that. “Came into me” is deliberately ambiguous; it may be taken literally, but it is also a euphemism for sexual intercourse (16:2; 30:3; 38:8–9). Having first accused Joseph, she then implicates her husband, “the one you brought in to us.” Finally, she discloses what Joseph has been doing “to fool with me.” This is subtly different from v 14, where she had said “to fool with us,” which could simply mean “insult”; here Joseph’s purpose in coming in to her is said to be sexual intimacy. But the clause could also be read as subordinate to “the one you brought in,” in which case she is not simply blaming her husband for acquiring a foreign slave but implying that Potiphar had acquired him deliberately to harass his wife. “The second reason obviously would be a sharp rebuke to the husband, suggesting that he had perversely invited trouble by introducing such a sexual menace into the household, but the wife is cunning enough to word the accusation in such a way that he will be left the choice of taking it as a direct rebuke or only an implicit and mild one” (Alter, Art of Biblical Narrative, 10). Her account has the desired effect. Potiphar is furious, and Joseph is put in prison. This is a somewhat unexpected punishment, because convicted rapists were executed when both parties were free citizens (Deut 22:23–27). A slave assaulting his master’s wife would certainly expect no better fate. But for some reason Joseph escaped the death penalty. Presumably his protestations of innocence, though unrecorded, were sufficient to convince Potiphar that his wife might not be telling the whole truth, so Joseph was given a lighter sentence. ”[3]
Hebrews 12:11 (NASB95) Sometimes life doesn't give a fair shake to people. Joseph was obviously in the right, and yet he was sent to prison as an innocent man. God still blessed him there though. Notice Joseph's attitude, he doesn't seem to be depressed or down in the dumps about being in prison, he makes the best of the situation, and soon moves into management of the prison where he is held. It is interesting that twice his clothes were used to convict him, one time to convince Jacob that he was dead, and this time to convict him of a crime that he did not commit, thus making him almost as good as dead. Yet he did not allow it to get him down, life goes on... What happened to Joseph was not really that much different than what we experience. He experienced a mild amount of success, and with the success at running Potiphar's house, came problems. One set of problems was that he had to suffer temptation, and he suffered from unjustified slander. Life is not always pretty, and it doesn't always go our way. There is a misconception that traps people into believing that if they just do good and live a righteous life they will be immune from problems in life. It’s Sunday, and typically this is a short study, sorry about getting carried away. If you wish to add to the study be sure to write in. Questions for thought: What do Joseph’s actions teach us about avoiding temptation and immorality? Father, as we consider Your word today, give each of us a desire to hold to the integrity of being faithful to You and to Your word. Make each one of us lights in a dark place, witnesses to a world that has forgotten You. In Him, Joe Turner. |
|
Joe,
Thanks.
Good looks: Joseph is recorded
as being handsome (Gen. 39:6). So are Saul (1 Sam. 1:9), David (1 Sam.
16:12, 18; 17:42), Absolom (2 Sam. 14:25), Adonijah (1 Kings 1:6), and
Solomon (Song 1:16).
Lifted up the requests.
IHG,
Erik
|
|
|